The $2,500 case presents a very interesting ethical plight. The employee profiled was of advanced laid off and in the process, it was realized that he had been clear a check for an unused flight from American Express. The dilemma then, is whether they should return the $2,500 check to their company, globose Banking Investments or if they know no obligation to do so any longer. Following a standard of universalism, they should return the funds to the company because that is by and swelled seen as the right thing to do among the majority of members of lodge. It is for this think that I would return the money, if I were in that situation. As discussed during class, it is non generally something that I would be able to see reservation the headlines and viewing myself in a positive light and in addition, I would not want to disclose that information to my family. until now though the check was accidentally given to them rather than Global Banking Investments, they ar still obligated to return it to the person or entity that it belongs to. They have no real ownership over the money and no right to encumber it. It is ethically wrong for them to keep it, regardless of if they were let go from the company.
Further, this connects with Deontology in that if they were to keep the money from their agent place of employment then it may bring into being universally acceptable. As Kant states, An individual must act as though his or her action would become the general decree of society. memory the money would bunch a bad cause for others in similar situations and may even lead to society accept it is acceptable to swindle from thei! r employer. In order to espouse a standard of morality and ethics it would be in their scoop out interest to return the money to their reason employee rather than risk their reputation and the negative trend that they could set for society.If you want to array a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper