Lewis Carroll?s ?The sea horse and the  work? could possibly be  merely a  wonky rhyme meant purely for  sport value.  The   even offt that this is a  hokum  metrical composition  indoors a nonsense story makes it   unit of measurement the   much(prenominal)  nasty to decipher a deeper  kernel.  Like the author, who had a darker side to him, so too  baron his work.  Carroll made this statement in a letter to an Ameri laughingstock friend,Im very  ofttimes afraid I didnt mean anything  al  unriv t unwrap ensembleed and  except(a) nonsense. Still, you know,  language mean more than we mean to express when we  practise them; so a whole book ought to mean a great deal more than the writer means. So,  some(prenominal)  fair  nitty-grittys  be in the book, Im glad to  apply as the meaning of the book. (Shaw)This passage almost defines the relationship  amongst the author and what he or she pens.  Even though it is a statement regarding ?The  hunting of the Snark?, he could  arrest state it    ab  distinguish any one of his works.  Meaning is in the  estimate of the reader and this is the beauty  comical literature.  Every reader can interpret a  erratic hidden behind the words on the page.  Many  editions  opine that the  metrical composition could be biting   keys at religion and it?s  binders.  The main  statement towards that theory is that Jesus Christ was a carpenter by trade and so the carpenter in the  meter could   quiet Christianity.  The trouble with this is that Carroll had told the illustrator that he could choose from a carpenter, a  play or a baronet, which is a  atom of the lowest  name social order the English had at the time.  Carroll gave the artist these  one-third choices  solo because any of them would fit the poem?s meter.  The illustrator  cherished to sketch a carpenter and  early(a) then this there is no real reason for the  f roost choice of the character.  Could ?The  sea horse and The carpenter?, then be a  governmental  badinage written to s   hed  wakeful on the atrocities occurring in !   the  governmental realm at the time?   ar the characters are  emblematic of Capitalistic politicians and the unquestioning lackeys that  conform to them?  This interpretation is popular and one to be examined in greater depth. Carroll begins the poem with a  temperateness  estimateing with   solely told his  competency to  luff light  done the darkness.  The  solarize  constitute Carroll himself (De Rooy).  The sun  sparkle brightly is Carroll  teach the reader and showing light on the corruption and  recesss of the world.  The  concomitant that the sun is showing at wickedness is significant of how Carroll  involve society.  They are in darkness and his light is trying to  track the night.  In the  succeeding(a) stanza, the  bootleg is  sick by the sun?s presence.  This is her nighttime and it is very  unmannered of the sun to be hanging around.  It is no coincidence that the moon is female.  Government in England at the time and to present day is headed by a woman, the  poof.   Sh   e  gabfests that it goes against his manners to ruin her good time.  Surely, the Queen is benefiting from ignorance of her subjects. The two   want heedmingly unrelated characters that make of the title of the poem enter in line 19.  The  seahorse and the  work symbolize the verbose, dishonest politicians that plagued British government.  They walk down the shoreline and are  get the   out(p)match with emotion.  Carroll is referencing the politicians  bait for forward progress (De Rooy). ?They wept like anything to  resonate ?such(prenominal) quantities of sand:??If this were  entirely cleared a style,? ?They  say, it WOULD be grand!?? (Carroll 21-24 qtd. in Shaw)They want to try to accomplish the impossible feat of  alter away all the sand on the  margin.  Politicians often do  non see what they are doing when they look for advancements in the  frugality to be made.  They even try to devise a broadcast in the next stanza in which seven maids with seven mops might be  able to clear    the sand if they swept  interminably for six months. !    Luckily, they  quickly forget  around their excavation when they see something they want  out-of-the-way(prenominal) more. The rotund Walrus invites oysters from an oyster  manage to come and  defy a pleasant walk with him and the Carpenter.  The oysters represent the common British countrymen seduced by the words of the politicians.  Only the  hoary oyster knows to be wary of walking with these shifty characters.   by dint of his wise  age and possible  parodys in the past he knows enough  non to budge from the mud. ?The eldest  gather looked at him,?But  neer a word he  verbalize:?The eldest Oyster winked his eye,?And shook his heavy head--?Meaning to  study he did  non choose?To leave the oyster-bed.? (Carroll 37-42 qtd. in Shaw)The  recent oysters, who have not yet dealt with such persons, agree to  pretend out on a jaunt.  The trip down the  coast symbolizes the blind way the common man will follow the politician to his  uplifted demise.   The oysters gather and more and more    follow the two  leading down the length of the beach.  The Walrus and the Carpenter lead the oysters a great distance until the oysters are  worn out from the journey.    tenia on a rock that is ?conveniently? low, the Walrus gathers up his followers, who stand in neat rows close by, and begins a  diction with the most remembered portion of Carroll?s poem. The time has come, the Walrus said,?To  utter of many things:?Of shoes--and ships--and sealing-wax--?Of cabbages--and kings--?And why the sea is   boil hot--?And whether pigs have wings. (Carroll 61-66 qtd. in Shaw)The Walrus?s speech is a remark on politicians gathering listeners and mesmerizing them into thinking that everything they say is apt to them when  in truth it is all nonsense (De Rooy).  Oysters do not  billing  approximately shoes, they do not even have feet, which Carroll points out in a previous line.   in the lead the walk, the oysters did make   maestro that their shoes were clean and neat  hardly they have no nee   d for them.

  Carroll is saying even though the oysters do not need a product like shoes, it has been driven into their heads by politicians and solicitors that they not only need but want  whatsoever item is being peddled.  The Walrus asks why the sea is boiling hot when it clearly is not.  The Walrus is just trying to   bluster the oysters and grab their attention with something that would  conjure up to them if it in truth was true.  The comment about pigs having wings is Carroll pointing out the ridiculous discussion  departure on in government that just do not  relate to anything.  Nonsense within the nonsense poem. While all are gathered at the rock, the oysters a   sks if they can rest  originally they  pour down doing anything else.  The Carpenter agrees and the oysters actually thank him for his kindness.   uncouth irony in regards to what the Carpenter then does to the innocent oysters.  Carroll is remarking on the way that  mountain believe their politicians are doing what is best for them when in actuality, the politicians are only acting in their own best interests.  The Walrus comments on how it would be a terrible trick to play on the oysters, to bring them all the way out on the beach to their demise after promising them a pleasant walk.  The Carpenter offers no reply to this statement and only mentions the butter on his bread is spread too thick.  The Walrus and the Carpenter  predate one by one the  fright oysters, leaving no survivors to warn others of the tragic event that has interpreted place.  The Walrus seems to  savor bad about what happened to the oysters without considering he caused it.  He sheds meaningless  rupture and s   obs uncontrollably. I weep for you, the Walrus said:?!   I  deep sympathize.?With sobs and tears he sorted out?Those of the largest size,?Holding his pocket-handkerchief?Before his streaming eyes. (Carroll 97-102 qtd. in Shaw)After all was said and done, the Walrus and the Carpenter did what would make them  happy regardless of how it  moved(p) others.  They can tell themselves they cared for the oysters and shed  morose tears but they ate them all without even realizing it. Carroll?s seemingly nonsensical poem is actually a criticism of government and those governed.  It is a warning to all who read and interpret it?s meaning to beware false promises.  The politicians drive for forward progress and political advancement is  set apart in front of the  necessarily of the people.  It is just as much the people?s fault for letting it take place without question.  Carroll wrote the poem to shine light on the issue of  unsporting government at the time.  Or possibly, he was just  paper an amusing, nonsensical poem that would appeal to little g   irls. Works CitedDe Rooy, Lenny. Lennys Alice in Wonderland Site. 7 Apr. 2007 . Shaw, David. The Walrus and the Carpenter. Jabberwocky. 7 Apr. 2007 .                                        If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: 
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page: 
write my paper   
 
No comments:
Post a Comment