Northanger Abbey Transformations

Explore the pedestal of Transformations in Northanger Abbey In Northanger Abbey Austen crafts from start to finish a perfect figure of speech of her possess satirical wit and hoaxd body fluid, which go to both lengths imaginable to camouflage and embed her novels faults. These demonstrate her great skill as a satirist in qualification the lecturer dig for their own enjoyment.Her meaning is drenched in multiple interpretations causing even eff opposites give care the exchangeed and unchanged to blur together, leaving as oerflowing says, The joke on everyone except Austen whose sophisticated meta-parody carries on transforming and confusing the reader ( overladen, Miriam 2010). Craik first contrived how to delve into Austens ridicule, and that was by realising that The literary burlesque is not incidental, nor integral (Craik, W A 1965).In my essay I am therefore going to delve deeply into the satirical, and reveal the dead on target transformations Austen think to pre sent. The first line of the text identifies Catherine Morland as the novels key figure for transformation No one who had ever seen Catherine Morland in her babyhood would have supposed her born to be an heroine (Austen, Jane Northanger Abbey 2003 PP. 5). Austen then ironic all toldy, and ambiguously, decks her stunned to be a burlesqued parody of the heroic archetype, thus transforming the perspective of what constitutes a heroine.Traditionally they were mind of as intelligent, beautiful and isolated like Eleanor Tilney, but we are told Catherine is occasionally stupidalmost prettyand (her father) was not in the least prone to locking up his daughters (PP. 5 7). Austen reverses the polarity of Catherines character transforming her into a more modern heroine, her point being that anyone can be a heroine as long as they evolve as opposed to stagnating like traditional mediaeval figures such as Emily St Aubert (Radcliffe, Anne 2008).Already Austen is choosing transformation and change over self-stagnation, while with feminist intentions breaks down the barrier that portrays women as self-reliant on the patriarchal strength of men by encouragement to live flavor on their own terms like Catherine Morland Let me go, Mr Thorpe. do not hold me (PP. 73). Austen introduces the unchanged character of Eleanor Tilney to high airy Catherines subconscious refusal to be helpless and passive (Fuller, Miriam 2010).Eleanor unlike Catherine relies on men for support throughout her life first her father, and then through a man of circumstance and consequence, which shows her real power (to be) nothing (PP. 185), in the light of Eleanors lack of transformation Catherines transformative nature is apparent by reign over contrast. By deviating from this generic norm Austen sets up Catherines own transformation from innocent, naive girl to blossoming, self-reliant woman. However many critics have debated whether or not Catherine in fact changes at all.This is the case for he r intuition, which is part of what Fuller called Catherines defences (2010), which according to Schaub Catherines romantic temperament, her intuition, is right in all her basic judgments (2000). Schaub is referencing Catherines interpretation of individuals such as General Tilney which all turn out to be correct in suspecting General Tilney of both murdering or shutting up his wife, she had scarcely sinned against his character, or magnified his inhuman treatment (PP. 183). A true transformation however does occur in Catherine abandoning her gothic unreality for objective reality (Butler, Marilyn 1975).Her change is illustrated in the fading out of Austens free indirect narrative, observed in volume one, for the true direct narrative perspective of Catherine herself, heard strongly in her judgment of conviction of Isabella she must think me an idiot, or she could not have written so( PP. 161). This narrative change shows the growth of mind that Austen observes in her own characte r, and she allows her the exemption to use it which has Catherine through transformative mistakes gain a greater perspective on the world Nothing could shortly be clearer, than that it had been all a voluntary, self-created double-dealing (PP. 46). Lastly a final sign of her ultimate growth is a change in her setting of choice after bonding Henry Tilney. or else of the sublime gothic grandeur of the abbey she chooses the simplistic pastoral setting of the vicarage In her heart she preferred it to any place she had ever been (PP. 156). The abbey of Northanger, that Catherine rejects, is traditionally seen as the key location for all gothic goings on. However it is my critical point assertion with Fuller, that the social codes of Bath are as labyrinthine as he passageways of Udolpho are to Emily, and according to Drabble like a minefield (2010) for the young Catherine Morland. Austen uses satire once again to confuse and camouflage the full roles these two settings play, making f or a clever and shocking juxtaposition as settings now transform along different lines. This is done through almost frequent and limpid references to the gothic in the anti-gothic setting of Northanger Darkness impenetrable and immoveable change the room (PP. 124) while contrasting it to more subtle and less detectable gothic in Bath Mr Thorpe only laughed, smacking his whip ( PP. 2). If we come with Fullers argument that Northanger abbey is part of what she terms the national chivalric (2010) a genre that highlights the sexual threat to young women the then Gilbertian misadventures of Catherine in Bath turn into events that closely resemble sexual abuse. in particular in the character of John Thorpe who transforms from a bawdy, comic figure, stumbling over himself to marry Catherine, into a sadistic sexual predator. This is seen in the simple contrast when he abducts young Catherine on a trip to Blaize castle (PP. 0), and Austen transform the light comedy of deception into a gothic abduction scene (Fuller, Miriam 2010). In which Thorpe lashes his clam into a brisker trot and takes her into the marketplace (PP. 62) thus turning Catherine into a goodness to be owned (Fuller, Miriam 2010). In her sudden character transformations Austen shows how she can remake any of her characters in an instance, making them comic one moment and shake the next, and it is also a warning to young women of the powerful and opportunistic members of edict that reside in Victorian resort towns like Bath (Fuller, Miriam 2010).Austens satire, as witnessed, goes to great lengths to confuse and mask her meaning. Her reasoning behind it is evidently her own enjoyment, and her desire to praise her medium of choice the novel. Her complexity and ambiguity are merely part of an elaborate, and in itself satirical complement to novels which she believes present the most thorough knowledge of human nature, the happiest delineation of its varieties, and the liveliest effusions of wit and humour (PP. 24). Bibliography Austen, Jane (20031818) Northanger Abbey, Lady Susan, The Watsons and Sandition (Oxford, Oxford University Press) Fuller, Miriam (2010) Let me go, Mr Thorpe Isabella, do not hold me Northanger Abbey at the Domestic Gothic Persuasions The Jane Austen Journal (Jane Austen Society of North America) Craik, W A (1965) Jane Austen The sextette Novels (W & J MacKay & Co ltd, Chatham, Great Britain) Schaub, Melissa (2000) Irony and Political statement in Northanger Abbey (Jane Austen Society of North America) http//www. asna. org/persuasions/on-line/vol21no1/schaub. html Accessed (27/0/2012) Butler, Marilyn (1975) Jane Austen and the warfare of Ideas The Juvenilia and Northanger Abbey (Clarendon Press, Oxford) Radcliffe, Anne (2008) The Mysteries of Udolpho (Oxford, Oxford University Press) Keymer, Thomas (2011 1997) Northanger Abbey and Sense and Sensibility The Cambridge Companion to Jane Austen (University Press Cambridge, Cambridge) Bush, Douglas (19781975) Jane Austen (The Macmillan Press LTD, London)