A Tale Of Two Cities :: essays research papers

A Tale of Two CitiesIn the novel A Tale of Two Cities there were three strands of the great unwashed theManettes, the Everemonds and the revolutionists. These three strands becamecritically entangled at one point in the book. Everyone of the strands became valetifold when Charles Darnay was found guilty at his trial and sentenced to death. Charles was currently involved with the Manette family when the revolutionistsimprisoned him for being an Evremonde. Of course there were many eventsleading up to Darnays conviction.The first event occurred when Dr. Manette was locked up in the Bastille by theEvremonde family. He was called upon to care for Madame Defarges sister andbrother, but when they died he was imprisoned so he could not tell anyone of theirmurder. Madame Defarge became very angry with the loss of her family and mean revenge against all the Evremondes. Dr. Manette stayed in the Bastille foreighteen years. During his time in there he wrote a diary of what went on. He alsolo st his individualism and became a shoe cobbler. When he finally got out of prison hehad no recollection of his early life.The second event was when Charles Darnay asked to marry Lucie Manette. Dr. Manette, who had be reunited with his daughter, saw no problem with themarri long time until Charles revealed his authoritative identity to everyone on the wedding day. Charless last(a) name was really Evremonde. His father was the man who put Dr.Manette in the Bastille for all those years. Manette forgave Charles because he wasnot like his barbarous father or his uncle, the Marquis St. Evremonde. Charles and Luciegot married as they planned to. The last event occurred when Madame Defarge planned revenge against allthe Evremondes. She was a revolutionist and knit a list of names for her people tomurder. Charles Darnay was added when she found out his real identity as anEvremonde. Also the names of his wife, Lucie Manette, and his newly borndaughter, microscopical Lucie, were added to her murder list. Charles and his family werenow in the middle of the three strands differences. Charles Dickens showed the blood between the Evremondes, theManettes and the revolutionists all through the one character, Charles Darnay. Hewas closely colligate to all these groups in many ways. Each part of the story was attached and related to each other so without the three events leading up toDarnays trial, the outcome of the story would of been different. It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of