Friday, January 25, 2019

Importance of good leadership command and management in military environment Essay

Importance of superb attr executionship, want and counselling in multitude surroundIntroduction            There is wide recognition of leadinghip, reignler and concern by dint of the eagle-eyed amounts of the available literatures. What is great leadhip, controller and concern? How rear entire leading skills be acquired? The study of leading, command and management is a life yen endeavour that is composed of not bad(predicate) values such as loyalty, cogency to act as well as the ability to pass clear messages to the subordinates in a particular group (Boulder, 2009, p.67). However, slender has been developed pertaining to the three although scholars recognize that they ar closely related peculiarly in the array context. In a broad spectrum, different scholars see defined leaders in different offices. Over a long detail, it has been impossible to determine whether leadership is an aspect or a eviscerate of status. However, according to Horn and Walker(2008), leadership is the ability of bingle human race world to stir sentiments in an brass sectional perspective and captivate the behaviours of new(prenominal)s especi every last(predicate)y the lesser. In view of this, it has been concluded that leadership is an inherent source of business leader the proponent to direct a group of people to fightds the happen uponment of a leaders goals by transmitting those goals into aims of everyone. In general, leadership is an elusive role that is expressed in different environments. Secondly, according to Beerel (2009), command refers to an coiffe habituated by a commander and engulfs the will of the commander expressed for the plan of bringing closely a particular change or achieving a specific objective. Use of command is mostly emphasized in the disembowel environments. Inherently, command is different at each direct of soldiery trading operations and the travail changes i n different dimensions in relation to the will and the skills of those in commands. Fin onlyy, the third feature is serious management. match to Boulder (2009), management refers to the organization, coordination, readying, despotic of organizational or a groups activities in order to gain the outflank and attain the nonplus goals. The three aspects ar slender and very valuable in the phalanx operations and their applications expect prodigious benefits in the operations at large. This research paper aims at baring the importances of leadership, command and management in array environments.            In the literature of phalanx, the three aspects of good organizational structure prevail vast amounts of definitions. In a broad spectrum, everyplace a long period scholars commence recognized the significance of good leadership and cohesion in host environments especi anyy when it comes to ensuring phalanx machine triu mph in variety of domains. either the same, it is evident that host activities can completely be achieved in force(p)ly if only every last(predicate) members can carry out their activities responsibly in a collective approach (Beerel, 2009, p.119). This essentially means that everybody in any forces operation irrespective of the occupation, operational rank or status has a role to play and should operate in accordance to the military directive principles. Most importantly, military leadership, command and management play a rattling role in ensuring the mentioned winner.            legions leadership is the lick of unfavourablely influencing opposite individuals in a military operation to obtain a posture explosive charge by touring a structured purpose, target objective, direction, and purposive motivation. On the other(a) hand, command is a term that is closely colligate to leadership in a military environment and it ref ers to the consent a person in military service legally exercises over other individuals or subordinates by the last merit of his or her rank and direct (Horn & antiophthalmic factorereWalker, 2008, p.48). This means that the most successful military organization is the one that practices god leadership and promotes cohesiveness that bonds the personnel together an integrated thought of rationale and belongingness. Although good leadership is non an easy task to define, juvenile research and scholars have developed a substantial basis that creates a relationship between a military operation per chassisance and good leadership, command and management. Inherently, good leadership has not only proved to have a positive impact on the performance unless has in standardized manner shown an emendd group functioning by buffering effects that arise from brusque leadership strategies. As illustrated and discussed by different researchers, leading in a military environment is char acterized a Leadership strategy that is not managerial in the military perspective as well as a style that focuses on personalized emphatic and direct contact with soldiers. Nevertheless, a military leadership should be charismatic in nature or else than glib (Horn &Walker, 2008, p. 109). In most fibres, leadership in the military is viewed as protective of certain members of a group. Most of the good leaders in this case argon guided by the capability of not focusing on success but focus on edifice and neutralizing on the failures originally realized (Beerel, 2009, p. 88). In wider terms, leadership comes in some shapes and approaches and each has both positive and negative. As a result, useful leaders ac fellowship the significance of applying the best strategies at all costs. In its simplest forms, leadership is all about influencing individuals to act and achieve some objectives that argon critical and important to the leader, the sinless group or even an organization (Horn &Walker, 2008, p. 176). In staple terms, leadership is a human constituent that leads, motivates and inspires particularly during times of chaos, misunderstandings, crisis and complexity and provides a solution when directives have less or no or have little effect on cold, wearied and stressed subordinates. In many cases, research has established that good leadership mostly in the military environment encourages subordinates to go beyond their obligations and committing themselves into the mission in a way that maximizes their possible (Beerel, 2009, p. 37). Most importantly, in the military good leadership serves as a very individualistic thus far a very business leaderful role that allows commanders and leaders at all levels to shape and alter the environment in which subordinates and thereby, influencing the individuals characters, behaviour and even the fulfils of others. As such, good leadership is a key operator in motive individuals to fight to a greater e xtent.            The most important thing about good leadership is that it provides the basis for the constructive role modelling consequently providing an extremely influence on individual reactions on curseening events. As pertains the American link in the universe War II, scholars have realized that leadership from in front especially in war is very imperative. In addition, researchers have repeatedly proven that the availability of solicitous leadership creates a force that suspensors resist fear in military environments and hence provide a strong constituent of combat motivation            In any military mission the main and the basic task of a leader is to take c atomic number 18 the success and the performance of the operation as well as ensuring the welf are of the subordinate colleagues. Further much, to hold in the quoted success, the command in military environments is offe red through an make structure that is the chain of command. In general, a chain of command is the place of commanders in an operation who have a series of duties and responsibilities to ensure the accomplishment of the mission as well as caring for the personnel and the possessions they are under charge. Particularly in the military, it is very important that soldiers including those in leadership understand that most of the time, they rely more on those who are on their left or right for shapeing support. Nevertheless, good leadership helps leaders gain honour from their subordinates. The key characteristics of good leadership in the military being honour, morality and integrity of which the three derive directly from the curious and pronounced intensity of the military environment in which the leadership is expressed. In terms of leadership, military organizations are different from other leadership organs in terms of their basic nature and reasons for being (Horn &Walker, 2 008). Consequently, the power of the military official to exercise and influence the performance of the other soldiers are as a result of good leadership. In fact, soldiers always watch over a good leader at any conditions of any battle. Nevertheless, good military leadership is built by evolution military familiarity, trustworthiness and reliance from following who in most cases are the soldiers. phalanx leadership in restorations with reference to an operation is important because it prevents the fighters from leaning towards different solutions hence preventing argumentation and confrontations within a group undertaking a springy manoeuvre.            summons in military perspective refers to the way and means by which the commander sees the claim and takes most appropriate and possible actions to have the need satisfied. Command encompasses all military operations and functions giving them a heart and matching to complete unit with functional entities. The duty of commanding is vested on the commander who is authorized by set statutes to give directives as the attitude whitethorn demand (Chapman, 2009, p.65). In military environment, command cannot be confused from control. Command endures with a view to imparting control on controls in order to ensure coordination and reply to emergency in military field of study. Commands may take a form of quick reaction that makes it possible to hunt down duties accurately in a moment of crisis. Command requires some level of experience, and judgment that can only be performed only by hot personnel who are capable of devising tactic and operation strategies. According to scholars, command occurs in three distinct categories that are highly associate to enhance the success of military operation. The basics for all command in the military activities is the power that is vested in the commanders, over their subordinates. The authority is in form of a rank that is bestowed to an individual either by the defiance force or by law through the constitution. In the military perspective, the personal command comes because of an individuals charisma, experience and diligence in the capital punishment of his duties. The other members of the organization normally crown this power to an individual. Noteworthy, official command provides the power to act but is not sufficient to make reverberative impacts (Shamir, 2011, p.109). Most of the powerful commanders possess extra power from the personal experience or inborn attributes. In the military, this high ground level of personal authority, coupled with legal power is what makes charismatic commanders in the forces and the powers are delegated to subordinates. However, the commanders remain accountable since they are obliged to report to senior authority for instance the head of state. Command in the defense reaction force is a complex activity that comprise of diverse but linked activities that are coordinated to achieved common direct and purpose. As a significant factor for success in military operations, command touches the peoples social, heathenish and economic. Nevertheless, the authority gained from possession of commanding power controls the inter relations among individuals of varying backgrounds. Military command exists in three categories that are diverse but highly related. These categories are legal, individual and departmental command (Wittmann, 2012, p.78).            Firstly, legal command is vested in the head of the state by the constitution that has the power over the armed forces. The head of state charges the secretary of the state the general task for security. The state secretary in turn confers the power to the commanders in oral sex of armed forces. For that reason, the command is vested to the commanders but through higher powers that assigns force to them to accomplish operation. (Shamir, 2011, p.98).The commanders, guided by military principle of service to the nation, organize coordinates and commands the legions carry out an operation. Command is the central feature of a formal military structure and defines the individual control over others in a given area of expertise.            Secondly, individual exercise of command involves the manner in which the commander makes terminations and conveys them to his juniors. The individual command gives commanders the authority, responsibility and duty to act in a manner that safeguards the safety of the state. In this case, the commander makes decision, communicates them and directs the subordinates to take action for accomplishment of a mission hence fostering success. However, the commander dust accountable for the decision they make (Muth, 2011, p.101). In this context, command and accountability requires stabbing epitome. To enhance efficient and smooth running of the military operat ions, commanders are likely and obliged to answer to the superior about the power delegated them. On the other side, subordinates in the military environments remain answerable to the commanders. Command in this case may include the acts of unequivocal, ordering and predicting of which the three enhance the aspect of afterlife success hence promoting success. Organizational command is related to entity figure of speech and takes stratified structure from the supreme to the subordinate hence this ensures that work is divided to achieve high level of coordination among the work activities involved in the force. Moreover, it is studyly concerned with family of labor, departmentalization, authority allocation and span control that promote efficacy. It is worth noting that, effective teach and education is important to commander in military environment. With the acquired knowledge from the training, planning skills are developed that sharpens situational awareness and is require d in the rapid response to combat and establish controls. Inherently, war being a major issue that brings conflict between parties, solution is needed and commonly comes in form of command. In the military, there is no single activity in accomplishing a mission that is as important as command. Command can end conflicts without devising attacks, destroying enemy targets and engaging in any war fighting activity (Muth, 2011, p.123). Planning organization and success of battles lies on the dot of command. In absence of command, military unit will possibly pervert into mobs and subordination of troops will be replaced by violence and misunderstanding. In review, command is the tool that drives all military activities and operations. Military command gives all the operations of martial purpose and direction. When command is well done, it grants the activities success and meaning. Contrary, under the weather executed military command calls for disasters from the potential enemies. C ommand bestows the commanders with an opportunity to best apply their intellectual capability to safeguard the safety of all citizens as well as upholding the troops reputation. Commander makes decision on what they shade is good for the people and then give directives to the subordinates to act immediately promoting response within the troops (Wittmann, 2012, p.77). Seemingly, senior commanders make suggestions about division of work at organizational level, delegate the authority and finally institute a span control. Eventually, these decisions become elaborate and clearly depict the organization structure. Command facilitates in building the military finis that outlines how operations are carried out. Establishing horticulture enables commanders to identify the weak point that need check for the improvement to be achieved.            According to Ploch, (2009), command includes task such as collecting and analyzing data, planning, or ganizing imaginativenesss and making decision that aims at monitoring and supervising military activities and operations. Command results to a procedure of executing an activity although its self not a procedure. In military context, command imparts control on all the activities and operations carried out that range from simple data collection to complex analysis to facilitate communication of instructions and information obtained. Commands in military environment helps at providing an insight into the requirements of an insecurity challenge faced by a nation. In addition, the command will assist at developing the word of honor about enemy and their habitat. As get byd by the Chapman (2009), best way to licking an enemy is by understanding his environment, tactics that they use and their intensity of their threat and this can only be achieved with good command in place. This enable s the military troops to unravel truths about the enemys intentions, strengths and weakness. Conse quently, the commander having the prerequisite skills and information is empowered to plan and deploy troops in a battle having situational awareness of the attacks.            Furthermore, commands aids in developing and setting suitable goals and devising mechanisms to adapt to those goals as the situation changes. Military authority lends a hand in developing appropriate action plan to attain desired aspirations. The power creates direction and focus that provides a vigorous approach for assessing numerous essentials of the force. Authority also provides for means of eonian monitoring and evaluation to assess the adaptability of the mechanisms employed. Above all, it should provide an opportunity to confine the military intentions against the potential enemies a long side developing a rapid response governing body. Briefly, good power and control should generate antiphonal actions that are appropriate, applicable, and decisive and s ecure (Shamir, 2011, P.79). Even though commanding system is constantly evolving, the basic nature is that war is undesirable and unwanted. Technological changes and improvements have lessened the demand for commands in the military environment. The evolution of commands has not unplowed pace with the complexities of warfare. Command seems to impart controls that are merely dealing with basic challenges of uncertainties of time. The impact of command remain static irrespective of the constant changes in the wars sophistications.            Another importance tool in the success of military operations is management. focal point in broad spectrum refers to the acts of organizing and coordinating human pick to achieve a desired objective (Schwartz, 2006, P.24). It is an important component in success of any activity. The success of the military operations high depends on the capability of the senior officers. It is a very complex issue and therefore best explained through it features. Actually, management has been a matter of schoolman interest as scholars try to unravel its functions and features (Dudley, 2012, p.67). Like Leadership, management is referred as one of the strong military tool since there does not exist any weapon that can replace it. The quality of management more often than not determines the success of defence forces operation. The success with which the troops accomplish mission is depended on the management skills of the commanders. Managers attempt to balance the allocation of resources to different units within an organization to achieve set goals. trouble is one of the major responses to security issues that military highly value (European Conference on acquaintance Management, & Neto, 2010, p.79). receivable to change and growth in size of defence forces, many complexities are evident in the military environments. To handle these sophistications, good planning, coordination and organiz ation is paramount. prissy and equitable allocation of resources assures of balance between all the units of the defence that are interdependent (Ehlen and Harmon, 2001, p.88). For the reason of this mutualism, the success of one unit is the success of the entire system therefore the existence of effective and efficient management brings about a certain degree of consistency to the important decisions made by the military officials. In the military as quoted earlier management develops the cogency to goals achievement through proper organization and staffing hence sets the organization structure and creates jobs to accomplish a military operation. This is achieved through care analysis of situations and providing a framework for accomplishment through decision-making. Management identifies a problem, suggests solution through process of problem solving and draws a plan for execution (Ehlen and Harmon, 2001, p.89). Noteworthy, military is very complex issue with many activities ru nning concurrently. These activities require planning coordination and balancing to have them executed simultaneously. For better results, motivation and inspiration on the part of staff is mandatory. Actually, management aims at maximizing human resource with the available skills and technology and it applies in the same way in the military therefore a key element in the success of military missions. For instance, good management in the forces helps officials to plan for financial resources and the numbers of troops to be deployed in a certain battle. (European Conference On Knowledge Management and Neto, 2010, p.106). In addition, good military management influences proper budgetary allocation by the supervision. Military administration is also very important in evaluating the success of an operation. In this, the operation is assessed whether it was time and cost effective. Management also assesses how a military activity achieves external goals. The results of evaluation helps t he managers reveal loopholes in the defence force and then suggest action to ensure that a nation is safe from all threats. In addition, management ensures that all the support organs of the military are availed for the continued success of the defence force. It may be argued that, the success of military lies in its management. Management combines all functional units in defence force and coordinates them to collectively achieve a collectively achieve a common goal (Dudley, 2012, p.109). According to the European Conference On Knowledge Management and Neto (2010), management is a spanking driving force that propels all the activities and the operations of the military. It outlines the necessary framework for the implementation of the policies and the decision made. In fact, European Conference On Knowledge Management and Neto (2010), proposed that there is need to improve management which is a vital element of military and effort mechanisms and should be put in place to improve f unctionality an endeavour that can only be achieved through training, benchmarking and motivation (Ehlen and Harmon, 2001, p.123). Institutions that offer military studies need to be boosted by the government through resource allocation with the core aim of improving the achieving high quality and efficient work force in the field of military. Additionally, the soldiers need some training especially in area that are highly challenging like the war torn area, where they are fully engaged in field operations. To achieve the overall success of the management other aspects should be co-ordinated to ensure balance among management leadership and command. The types of leadership with the defence forces help at streaming the command that exist. Management comes as a facilitator of the overall implementation of what is decided at the drawing table.            As defined earlier in the introduction, management in the military context refers to th e allocation and control as well as the coordination of human, financial and material resources to achieve the goals and objectives set (Rodt, 2014, p. 77). Essentially, in matters concerning military operations, the measure for good management is the ability to achieve balance in all activities undertaken. For managers senior individuals in a military environment to ensure that their management operations are good and effective, scholars argue that knowing the roles they should play in order to achieve success is essential. Without good and effective management strategies in organizations more so the military groups in the ready-moving and dynamic environment, the operations tend to turn chaotic and this in the long rum may threaten success (Sooters et al., 2010, p. 128). As a basic factor and component of success in any organizational process and approach, management brings a degree of consistency to some of the critical decision made by the senior officials in the military. In t he same way as in other organizations, management in the military has not been left behind in promoting staffing. It develops the capacity for military organizations to achieve their plans by aligning individuals into the positions they best fit (Rodt, 2014, p. 77). When deeply analyzed, management applies the same approaches as leadership and command. In this sense, separating the three in the military environment denies success a chance hence failure to attain the set objectives. In addition, in the military environment, management ensures plan accomplishment by controlling and monitoring through the analysis and evaluation of the results achieved versus the plan.            As leadership, command and management in the present times are more than the leader and the led, more than the commander and the commanded as well as more than the manager and the managed respectively, the officers of at present in the military have to subtly develo p good and in effect(p) alternative ways through which, they will lead, command and manage efficiently. For instance, in the present the Royal Air Force subordinates are treated in ethical way such that they can question any manipulation accorded to them by their seniors hence provoking the traditional methods that used to utilize the acknowledged commands form above. Actually, the traditional approaches that undermined the status of the subordinates should no longer be welcome in any military environment (Sooters et al., 2010, p. 128). Today, military organizations due to good leadership, command and management can move from temporary and uncooperative systems to more empowered groups hence nurturing healthy, decent and valuable followers that with the post-bureaucratic minds can excite any military agenda towards its success. Additionally, leaders, managers and commanders in the military should adhere to good leadership styles, team building strategies and matrix-style manage ment that helps bring together military fraternity and inter agency operations in a fast paced, high tempo environment. At the same time, the officials should continuously and simultaneously design and implement policies and plans to maximize on group cohesion, promote subordinate potential as well as providing healthy professional ethics. With this kind of ambiance in the military environment, this kind of leadership will end up creating more future leaders rather than developing lenient followers (Rodt, 2014, p. 77). Therefore, major purpose and goal of such up to date leaders, commanders and managers would turn change, transforming people and military organizations by setting and articulating vivid vision and implementing effective strategies that inspire even others. Some scholars refer to the three as The mastery Trinity. To sum up, good and effective leadership, command and management in the military context serve as the three pillars that support success.ReferencesBeerel, A. C. (2009). Leadership and change management. Los Angeles, SAGE.Boulder.CO. (2009). Military leadership in pursuit of excellence. Boulder, CO, Westview Press.Chapman, B. (2009). Military article of belief a reference handbook. Santa Barbara, Calif, ABC-CLIO.Dudley, M. (2012). An environmental history of the UK Defence Estate, 1945 to the present. London, New York.Ehlen, J., & Harmon, R. S. (2001). Encyclopedia of knowledge management. Hershey, PA, Idea Group Reference.European Conference On Knowledge Management, & Neto, M. D. C. (2010). Proceedings of the 4th European conference on information management and evaluation Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal 9-10 September 2010. Reading, Academic Publishing.Muth, J. (2011). Command culture officer education in the U.S. Army and the German Armed Forces, 1901-1940, and the consequences for World War II. Denton, Tex, University of North Texas Press.Ploch, L. (2009). Africa Command U.S. strategic interests and the role of the U.S. military in Africa. Washington, D.C., Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.Rodt. P.A. (2014).The European Union and Military deviation Management Defining, Evaluating and Achieving Success. Routledge.PressShamir, E. (2011). Transforming Command the Pursuit of Mission Command in the U.S., British, and Israeli Armies. Palo Alto, Stanford University Press.Soeters, J., Fenema, P. V., & Beeres, R. (2010). Managing military organizations theory and practice. London, Routledge.Walker, R. W., & Horn, B. (2008). The military leadership handbook. Kingston, Ont, Canadian Defence Academy Press.Wittmann, J. (2012). Auftragstaktik just a command technique or the core pillar of mastering the military operational art? CHAPMAN, B. (2009). Military doctrine a reference handbook. Santa Barbara, Calif, ABC-CLIO.Source document

No comments:

Post a Comment